International E-publication: Publish Projects, Dissertation, Theses, Books, Souvenir, Conference Proceeding with ISBN.  International E-Bulletin: Information/News regarding: Academics and Research

Quantitative interpretation of potential field data in parts of Sakoli and Sausar fold belt in MP and Maharashtra, Central India

Author Affiliations

  • 1Geological Survey of India, Central Region, Nagpur, India and Department of Geophysics, BHU, Varanasi, India
  • 2Geological Survey of India, Central Region, Nagpur, India
  • 3Department of Geophysics, BHU, Varanasi, India
  • 4Geological Survey of India, Northern Region, Lucknow, India
  • 5Geological Survey of India, SR, SU: AP, Hyderabad, India
  • 6Geological Survey of India, M & CSD, Visakhapatnam, India
  • 7Geological Survey of India, Western Region, Jaipur, India
  • 8Geological Survey of India, Northern Region, Lucknow, India
  • 9Geological Survey of India, Western Region, Jaipur, India

Int. Res. J. Earth Sci., Volume 11, Issue (2), Pages 1-11, August,25 (2023)

Abstract

The present study is intended for quantitative interpretation of gravity and magnetic data over Sausar and Sakoli belts in Madhya Pradesh and Maharashtra States, Central India. The gravity and magnetic data are used for the study were acquired under National Geophysical Mapping (NGPM) program of Geological Survey of India (GSI) covering an area of 6300 Km2 during field season period 2012-14. The Sakoli and Sausar fold belts are the main structural domains in the area and well known for polyphase deformation activities. The metallic and non-metallic mineralization occurrences are also reported in these structural domains. The important feature, Central India Shear (CIS), demarcated as lineament F6-F6’ is observed as steep gradient in Bouguer gravity anomaly map. Radially average power spectrum (RAPS) analysis of the gravity and magnetic data may be suggested average depth of basement around 4.5 Km and average depth of Sakoli and Sausar belts around 1.25 Km.

References

  1. Dahanayake, K., & Subasinghe, S. M. N. D. (1988)., Development of recent stromatolitic structures and phosphatic enrichment in Precambrian marble of Sri Lanka., Economic Geology, 83(7), 1468-1474.
  2. Subasinghe, N. D. (1998)., Formation of a phosphate deposit through weathering and diagenesis–an example from Sri Lanka., (Doctoral dissertation, PhD Thesis (Unpubl.) University of Reading).
  3. Basu, N.K. (1958)., On the stratigraphy and structure of the Sausar Series of Mahuli-Ramtek area, Nagpur district, Bombay., Quarterly journal of the Geological, Mining, and Metallurgical Society of India, 5(30), 39-41.
  4. Mohanty, S.P. (1993)., Stratigraphic position of the Tirodi gneiss in the Precambrian terrane of central India: evidence from the Mansar area, Nagpur district, Maharashtra., Journal of Geological Society of India, 41(40), 55-60.
  5. Yedekar, D.B., Karmalkar, N., Pawar, N.J. and Jain, S.C. (2003)., Tectonomagmatic evolution of Central Indian terrain., Gondwana Geological Magazine, 7, 67-88.
  6. Wanjari N. and Ahmad T. (2007)., Geochemistry of Granitoids and Associated Mafic Enclaves in Kalpathri Area of Amgaon Gneissic Complex, Central India., Gondwana Geological Magazine, 10, 55-64.
  7. Basu N.K. and Sarkar S.N. (1966)., Stratigraphy and structure of the Sausar Series in the Mahuli-Ramtek-Junawani area, Nagpur district, Maharashtra., Quarterly journal of the Geological, Mining, and Metallurgical Society of India, 5(38), 77-105.
  8. Mohanty S. (1988)., Structural evolution of the southern part of the Sausar belt near Ramtek, Nagpur district, Maharashtra., Indian Journal of Geology, 3(60), 200-210.
  9. Rao G.V. (1970)., The geology and manganese-ore deposits of the manganese belt in Madhya Pradesh and adjoining parts of Maharashtra. Part II - The geology and manganeseore deposits of Kanhan-Pench valley area, Nagpur district, Maharashtra and Chhindwara district, Madhya Pradesh., Bulletin of Geological Survey of India, 5(A-22, II), l-l00.
  10. Straczek, J. A. (1956)., Manganese ore deposits of Madhya Pradesh, India, Symposium Sobre Yacimientos De Manganeso., In Toma IV. Asiay Oceania. XX Congreso Geologico International Mexico (pp. 63-96).
  11. Subramanyam M.R. (1972)., The geology and manganese ore deposits of the manganese belt in Madhya Pradesh and adjoining parts of Maharashtra. Part VI - The geology and manganese deposits of Ramrama-Sonawani area, Waraseoni Tahsil, Balaghat district and parts of Seoni Tahsil, Chhindwara district, Madhya Pradesh., Bulletin of Geological Survey of India, 5(A-22,VI), 1-53.
  12. Mohanty N., Singh S.P., Satyanarayanan M., Jayananda M., Korakoppa M.M. and Hiloidari S. (2018)., Chromian spinel compositions from Madawara ultramaBcs, Bundelkhand Craton: Implications on petrogenesis and tectonic evolution of the southern part of Bundelkhand Craton, central India., Geological Journal, 54, 2099-2123.
  13. Saha D. and Mazumder R. (2012)., An overview of the Palaeoproterozoic Geology of Peninsular India, and key Stratigraphic and Tectonic Issues., Geological Society of London, 365, 5-29, https://doi.org/10.1144/sp365.2.
  14. Stein H., Hannah J., Zimmerman A. and Markey R. (2006)., Mineralization and deformation of the Malanjkhand terrane (2,490–2,440 Ma) along the southern margin of the Central Indian Tectonic Zone., Mineralium Deposita, 40, 755-765.
  15. Sarkar S.N., Trivedi J.R. and Gopalan K. (1986)., Rb–Sr whole rock and mineral isochron age of the Tirodi gneiss, Sausar Group, Bhandara district, Maharashtr., Geological Society of India, 27, 30-37.
  16. Bhowmik S.K., Wilde S.A. and Bhandari A. (2011)., Zircon U–Pb/Lu–Hf and monazite chemical dating of the tirodi biotite gneiss: implication for Latest Paleoproterozoic to Early Mesoproterozoic Orogenesis in the Central Indian Tectonic Zone., Geological Journal, DOI:10.1002/gj.1299.
  17. Pandey B.K., Krishna V. and Chabria T. (1998)., An overview of Chhota nagpur gneissgranulite complex and adjoining sedimentary sequences, Eastern and Central India, International seminar on Precambrian crust in eastern and central India: UNESCO-International Union of Geological Sciences., International Geoscience Programme-368, 131-135.
  18. Roy A., Kagami H., Yoshida M., Roy A., Bandyopadhyay B.K., Chattopadhyay A., Khan A.S., Huin A.K. and Pal, T. (2006)., Rb-Sr and Sm-Nd dating of different metamorphic events from the Sausar Mobile Belt, central India: Implications for Proterozoic crustal evolution., Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 26, 61-76.
  19. Lippolt H.J. and Hautmann S. (1995)., 40Ar/39Ar ages of Precambrian manganese ore minerals from Sweden, India and Morocco., Mineralium Deposita, 30, 246–256.
  20. GSI (2017)., Geological survey of India., https://bhukosh.gsi.gov.in/Bhukosh/Public.
  21. Baranov V. (1957a)., A new method for interpretation of aeromagnetic maps: Pseudogravimetric anomalies., Geophysics, 22, 359-383.
  22. Roest, Walter R. and Pilkington, Mark (1993)., Identifying remanent magnetization effects in magnetic data., Geophysics, 58 (5). 653-659.
  23. Mandal A., Chandroth A., Basantaray A.K. and Mishra U. (2020)., Delineation of shallow structures in Madawara igneous complex, Bundelkhand Craton, India using gravitymagnetic data: Implication to tectonic evolution and mineralization., Journal of Earth System Science, 129(90), 1-17.
  24. Bhuvan (2021). Indian Geo-Platform of ISRO. https://bhuvan-app3.nrsc.gov.in/data/download/index.php, SRTM data, July 15, 2021., undefined, undefined
  25. Thompson, D.T. (1982)., EUlDPH: A New Technique for Making Computer-Assisted Depth Estimates from Magnetic Data., Geophysics, 47, 31-37.