8th International Science Congress (ISC-2018).  International E-publication: Publish Projects, Dissertation, Theses, Books, Souvenir, Conference Proceeding with ISBN.  International E-Bulletin: Information/News regarding: Academics and Research

Status of host resistance against selected viral diseases of tomato crops

Author Affiliations

  • 1Nepal Agricultural Research Council, Kathmandu, Nepal

Res. J. Agriculture & Forestry Sci., Volume 6, Issue (5), Pages 7-13, May,8 (2018)

Abstract

Virus diseases are one of the most devastating barriers for a successful and commercial production of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). The study aims to review the status of selected virus diseases of tomato and to overview the advancement in host resistance against the virus diseases. Tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV), Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV), Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV), Tomato mosaic virus (ToMV), Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) and Tomato mottle virus (ToMoV) are the most devastating virus diseases of tomato. Various cultural, integrated, resistant and chemical methods (against insect vectors) have been developed to reduce the yield loss due to virus diseases; however, only host resistance were effective to some extent. The wild families of tomato Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium, Lycopersicon peruvianum, Lycopersicon cheesmani, Lycopersicon peruvianum and Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium have robust resistance against Tomato yellow leaf curl virus. Similarly Pimpertylc-J-13, Chepertylc-92 and hybrid Mirella are some other lines which have resistance against TYLCV of Tomato. Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium, Lycopersicon hirsutum, Lycopersicon chilense and Lycopersicon peruvianum have been identified having resistant characteristics against Tomato spotted wilt virus. Tomato varieties Pearl Harbour and Manzana have strain-specific resistant. Several tomato hybrids having Sw-5 gene were resistance against Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus. The dominant genes Tm-22 and Tm-2 which is an allelic of Tm-22 have considerable level of resistance against Tobacco mosaic virus in different regions of Asia. Transgenic line 4174 have ample resistance against mechanical infections by TMV. Several wild species of Tomato have exhibited resistance against Cucumber mosaic virus; however, due to polygenic nature of the resistance and plant infertility problems the development of durable resistant varieties against the disease is not much successful. Durable resistance to Tomato mottle virus has been obtained from different wild species of Lycopersicon spp. The treatment of Tomato plants with plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) augmented the induced resistance against Tomato mottle virus. Latest researches have been concentrated on genetic engineering which focus on the manipulation, modification and inclusion of resistant genes from other species, none host species and also from the pathogen itself; however, the worries on negative impacts of transgenic crops must be cleared by further research and findings.

References

  1. Sastrosiswojo S. (1995)., Integrated pest management in vegetable production., Symposium on Small Scale vegetable production and Horticultural Economics in Developing Countries. ISHS Acta Horticulturae. 369 (www.actahort. org/books/369).
  2. Zaitlin M. and Palukaitis P. (2000)., Advances in Understanding Plant Viruses and Virus Diseases. Annual Review of phytopathology., 38, 117-143.
  3. Barker H., Reavy B. and McGeachy K.D. (1998)., High level resistance in potato to potato mop-top virus induced by transformation with the coat protein gene., European Journal of Plant Pathology, 104(7), 737-740.
  4. Murphy F.A., Fauquet C.M., Bishop D.H.L., Ghabrial S.A., Jarvis A.W., Martelli G.P., Mayo M. A. and Summers M.D. (1995)., Virus Taxonomy: Sixth report of the international Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses., Springer-Verlag, Wein and New York.
  5. Salvador R., Maria J., Diez O. and Fernando N. (1996)., Diseases causing the greatest economic losses in tomato crop. The Tomato spotted wilt virus- A review., Scientia Horticuhurae, 67, 117- 150.
  6. Zitter T.A. (1984)., Virus Diseases and Disorders of Tomato., Vegetable Crops Fact Sheet. Cornell University, USA, 735-740.
  7. Noris E., Accotto G.P., Tavazza R., Brunetti A., Crespi S. and Tavazza M. (1996)., Resistance to tomato yellow leaf curl geminivirus in Nicotiana benthamiana plants transformed with atruncated viral C1 gene., Virology, 224, 130-138.
  8. Mendoza H.A., Mihovilovich E.J. and Saguma F. (1996)., Identification of Triplex potato virus Y (PVY) immune progenitors derived from Solanum tuberosum., American Potato Journal, 73, 13-19.
  9. Moriones E. (2000)., TYLCV Data Sheet., EWSN, U.K.
  10. Momol M.T., Simone G.W., Dankers W., Sprenkel R.K., Olson S.M., Momol E.A., Polston J.E. and Hiebert E. (1999)., First report of Tomato yellow leaf curl virus in tomato in South Georgia., Plant Disease, 83, 487.
  11. Brunt A., Crabtree K. and Gibbs A. (1990)., Viruses of tropical plants., Wallingford: CAB International, 707.
  12. Pilowski M. and Cohen S. (1990)., Tolerance to tomato yellow leaf curl virus derived from Lycopersicon peruvianum., Plant Dis., 74, 248-250.
  13. Laterrot H. (1992)., Resistance genetics to tomato yellow leaf curl virus., Tomato Yellow Leaf Curl Newsletter No. 1, 2-4.
  14. Channarayappa A., Shivashankar G., Muniyappa V. and Frist R.H. (1992)., Resistance of Lycopersicon species to Bemisia tabaci, a tomato leaf curl virus vector., Can. J. Bot., 70, 2184-2192.
  15. Kremida D. (2007)., Virus-resistant tomato hits Turkish market., Antalya - Turkish Daily News. Thursday, December 13, 2007.
  16. Czosnek H. and Laterrot H. (1997)., A world-wide survey of Tomato yellow leaf curl viruses., Arch.Virol., 142, 1391-1406.
  17. Sakimura K. (1962)., The present status of thrips-borne viruses., K. Maramorosch (Editor), Biological Transmission of Disease Agents. Academic Press, New York, 33-40.
  18. Franeki R.I. and Hatta T. (1981)., Tomato spotted will virus. In: Handbook of Plant Virus., Diseases and Comparative Diagnosis E. Kurstak (Ed.), 491-512.
  19. De Avila A.C., De Haan P., Kormelink R., Resende R., Goldbach R.W. and Peters D. (1993)., Classification of tospoviruses based on phylogeny of nucleoprotein gene sequences., Journal of General Virology, 74, 153-159.
  20. Moury B., Palloix A., Selassie K.G. and Marchoux G. (1997)., Hypersensitive resistance to tomato spotted wilt virus in three Capsicum chinense accessions is controlled by a single gene and is overcome by virulent strains., Euphytica, 94(1), 45-52.
  21. Stevens M.R., Scott S.J. and Gergerich R.C. (1994)., Evaluation of seven Lycopersicon species for resistance to tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV)., Euphytica, 80, 79-84.
  22. Finlay K.W. (1953)., Inheritance of spotted wilt resistance in tomato. II. Five genes controlling spotted wilt resistance in four tomato types., Australian Journal of Biological Science, 6, 153-163.
  23. Stevens M.R., Scott S.J. and Gergerich R.C. (1992)., Inheritance of a gene for resistance to tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) from Lycopersicon peruuianum., Euphytica, 59, 9-17.
  24. Diez M.J. (1995)., Tipos varietales., In: F. Nuez (Editor), El Cultivo de1 Tomate. Mundi-Prensa, Madrid, 93-130.
  25. Laterrot H. (2000)., Disease resistance in tomato: practical situation., Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 22(3), 328-331.
  26. Elkind Y., Kedar N., Katan Y., Couteaudier Y. and Laterrot H. (1988)., Linkage between Tm-2 and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. radicis-lycopersici resistance (FORL)., Rep. Tomato Genet. Coop, 38, 22.
  27. Vakalounakis D.J., Laterrot H., Moretti A., Ligoxigakis E. K. and Smardas K. (1997)., Linkage between Frl (Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. radicii lycopersici resistance) and Tm-2 (Tobacco mosaic virus resistance-2) loci in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum)., Annual Appl. Biol., 130, 319-323.
  28. Nelson R.S., McCormick S.M., Delannay X., Dube P., Layton J., Anderson E.J., Kaniewska M., Proksch R.K., Horsch R.B., Rogers S.G., Fraley R.T. and Beachy R.N. (1988)., Virus tolerance, plant growth, and field performance of transgenic tomato plants expressing coat protein from tobacco mosaic virus., Biotechnology, 6, 403-409.
  29. Hollings M. and Huttinga H. (1976)., Tomato Mosaic Virus., CMI/AAB Descriptions of Plant Viruses. Kew, Surrey, England. No.6. 156.
  30. Broadbent L. (1976)., Epidemiology and control of tomato mosaic virus., Annual Review of Phytopathology, 14, 75-96.
  31. Lukyanenko A.N. (1991)., Disease resistance in tomato. In Genetic improvement of tomato., Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 99-119.
  32. Watterson J.C. (1993)., Development and breeding of resistance to pepper and tomato viruses., In: Kyle, M.M. (ed), Resistance to viral diseases of vegetables: genetics & breeding, Timber Press, Oregon, 80-101.
  33. Tien P., Zhang X., Qiu B., Qin B. and Wu G. (1987)., Satellite RNA for control of plant diseases caused by cucumber mosaic virus., Annals of Applied Biology, 111, 143-152.
  34. Provvidenti R. and Gonsalves D. (1995)., Inheritance of resistance to cucumber mosaic virus in a transgenic tomato line with the coat protein gene of the white leaf strain., Journal of Heredity, 86, 85-88.
  35. Xue B., Gonsalves C., Provvidenti R., Slightom J.L., Fuchs M. and Gonsalves D. (1994)., Development of transgenic tomato expressing a high level of resistance to cucumber mosaic virus strains of subgroup I and II., Plant Disease, 78, 1038-1041.
  36. Fuchs M., Provvidenti R., Slightom J.L. and Gonsalves D. (1996)., Evaluation of transgenic tomato plants expressing the coat protein gene of cucumber mosaic virus strain WL under field conditions., Plant Disease, 80, 270-275.
  37. Abouzid A. and Hiebert E. (1991)., Characterisation of Florida tomato geminivirus., Phytopathology, 81, 1184.
  38. Murphy J.F., Zehnder G.W., Schuster D.J., Sikora E.J., Polston J.E. and Kloepper J.W. (2000)., Plant growth-promoting rhizobacterial mediated protection in tomato against Tomato mottle virus., Plant Diseases, 84, 779-784.
  39. Harrison B.D. and Murant A.F. (1977)., Nepovirus group., Common wealth mycological institute/Association of applied biologist descriptions of plant viruses, 4, 185.